In Adobe Acrobat, crop the document to get rid of the numbers on the side and anything else that is not text so that when you copy, you do not get any of that extra stuff. Then, copy and paste your selected text into a notepad file and save it as a .txt. You are going to have to make sure that the word wrapping is right. Do not use the tool in TrialDirector to do that, it does not work. You might just have to go through by hand and do it. entering hard returns at the end of each line. In Timecoder, go to tools/apply page/line formatting.

The site is undergoing some changes to make things more visual and informative.  Any comments are always appreciated as long as they are nice comments.  I've just completed one contract assignment and I am looking for additional work so if you know of someone that may need assistance, please feel free to contact me or refer me to your friends.  Thanks.

I don't know about you but I did not find the iData Corp training session to be very helpful with respect to using Third Party software - especially Summation - which is supposedly very integral to TD.  My general feedback from other TD users is that TD does not like load files of any kind so don't use them. I used the Summation load file but had to make a few changes. Here is the process I went through to get images, bates range, document breaks and page counts loaded. The only alternative tot his is a manual load and if your data covers 40,000 pages or more that may be more daunting than time allows.

First of all, what ever images, or data coding you have, you should copy it to your hard drive or local server location.

Second copy the load file for summation - the one that ends in DII - and change the ending to TXT.  Open the file in your Notepad or Notepad++ application.  You will see a line that reads:

                                                         @D @I Box 34 

The Box 34 may also be a path to images on a CD such as \MYDATA2013_001\IMAGES\00\00\

What you want to know is that the @D is a TOKEN in Summation that is required for every image - in SUMMATION ONLY.  TD can not use these TOKENS. The @I  TOKEN  refers to the image location and can be replaced with a UNC PATH or hard drive location such as:




Simply go into the Notepad replace dialogue box and add the correct path for all occurrences of @I or @D using the text editor "Replace All" dialogue box.

Once this is done, rename and save this file to your local hard drive and remember to rename it using the DII suffix.  Then go into TD and choose the DOCUMENT menu for batch uploading. A dialogue box will give you a choice of types of batch files to use. It automatically defaults to TD format but you can select Summation(tm) Document Information Index (*.DII)

Then you wait for the documents and images to load.  Depending on size of load this could take a while.  

Once that is done you may still not see your images.  You then have to go to TD's TOOLS menu/Global Editor and remove any token shown for the path to the images. You may see:  

                                           @D @I  C:\PFRANC\IMAGES\00\0

This needs to be changed to

                              C:\PFRANC\IMAGES\00\0, or; 

Click save, return to Explorer in TD and see if you can see the image. Each document should now be loaded with the correct document page count.

The Facebook settlement is not a hoax.  I've seen lots of people asking if it is but to help you out I repost the link to the site that appears to have the best information on how to file:  http://www.fraleyfacebooksettlement.com/  
I was on Facebook tonight trying to engage folks in an enlightened discussion of the recent hearings on Benghazi. I was defending Hillary Clinton and in the course of things there was suddenly this post that started to post but suddenly disappeared. I caught the name of the person who was posting so I wrote to them and begged for them to please continue what they were going to say. Then this arrived and it moved me in a very emotional way so I think more people should read this and I have made it freely available because Mr. Dlouhy said it could be used:

from: Dave Dlouhy 

Let me share my experience with you. I want to be very cautious in trying to convey something to you. It needs a bit of reflection. I knew Chris Stevens. We are fellow Foreign Service Officers. I am now retired after 34 years of service. I served in three high threat posts: El Salvador during the war, Bosnia just after the war, and running the drug war in Bolivia. For six years I lived 24/7 with bodyguards protecting me from very real threats. For three years I had the honor of representing you as Charge/Acting US Ambassador.

In that role, Ambassadors do not report in-country travel to the Department, nor do they ask permission. They do so only when they leave the country. 

Intelligence on threats flows from the Embassy to the Department, not vice versa. The Ambassador is the first to know.

Marines are not bodyguards. They protect facilities and classified. The Regional Security Officer and staff are the bodyguards and supervise local protection employees and staff. The RSO reviews the Ambassador’s movements, but the final decision to travel is made by the Ambassador.

Decisions on levels of protection and resources are made by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security in coordination with multiple agencies (CIA, NSA, DOD, DIA). An Ambassador is aware of the threat – and the resources deployed to address that threat – before any move in country.

There is no US Consulate in Benghazi. The Embassy is in Tripoli. There are two US sites in Benghazi. Both were attacked. One is a CIA safehouse. The other is the US Department of State Operational Support Base – the office we used to support the rebels during the revolution. That is why the facility was not constructed to US security standards. Both were ”black” sites.

Chris Stevens decided he needed to go to Benghazi. For whatever reason, and on the days that he went. He did not ask permission, nor did he inform the Department, ie, Secretary Clinton. Chris was aware of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security’s response to his security requests. Chris had reported on the threat and threat environment prevailing the date of his death. Chris decided to go to Benghazi. It was his decision.

Groupthink interpretation led many community analysts to view the violence in Libya as copycat of violence in Cairo. The mob attack was not perceived initially as a coordinated terrorist strike, but was quickly characterized so. But spinning out of a mob.

Hours before the attack, Chris was out walking in the streets, as he was accustomed to doing. That is to say, not only did he make the call to go to Benghazi, he did not see a threat and requirement for higher levels of protection.

Chris died. And we grieve. It is a disservice to his memory to politicize his death. He would be the first to take responsibility for his decisions. He would not seek to place blame, or make a partisan issue of it. He was a remarkable US diplomat. Those of us who have served in war zones understand the risk we take. We accept the responsibility for our decisions. Outcomes are our responsibility. Colleagues in the Bureau of Diplomatic Security are being made the fall guys for supposedly bad decisions. That is unfair. It does not matter what decision they made. You operate in the context of those decisions. If security was inadequate, then you do not travel. If additional precautions need to be taken, you do so. But, you do not blame others. Most assuredly, you do not blame Hillary Clinton. Chris, a friend of Senator McCain, would most certainly be appalled and the first to object. Let us honor his memory by being true to the man of integrity and patriot that he was. Chris, a friend of Senator McCain, would most certainly be appalled and the first to object. Let us honor his memory by being true to the man of integrity and patriot that he was.

-- -----------------------------------------------------
Lawyer to Lawyer: First Encounters with Trial Director Alan J. Steinberg and substantially edited by J.D. Keane

Comments by ATP: I found this to be a frank discussion as to how TD is used in pre-trial preparation and the value the software offered to a small Missouri law firm.

They can be contacted here:
Steinberg & Steinberg, LLC
655 Craig Rd., Suite 338
Saint Louis, Missouri 6314
"This article provides an overview of articles and videos related to the science of persuasion for litigators and litigation support professionals." Link to the article ==>here
 by Ken Lopez
Founder & CEO
A2L Consulting


The Lucas Mageno Journey Part I: From Southern California Rock Bands to Furniture Sales to Litigation Services = Follow the story in three parts about  Lucas Mageno.  Lucas has had a long term and visible impact on shaping the litigation technology and services industry in the United States.  However, you may be surprised to learn that his journey to reach the top of his industry rivals that of many unsuspecting heroes from famous literature.
Judges and juries often reach similar decisions, although there are times these decisions differ.

Eisenberg and colleagues (2006) analyzed thousands of trials from a substantial part of the nation's most populous counties.

Evidence across 10 years and three major data sets suggests that juries and judges differentially award punitive damages in financial injury and bodily injury cases.

Jury trials have a higher rate of punitive damage awards in financial injury cases, while bench trials have a higher rate of punitive damage awards in bodily injury cases.

Source:  Website 
Online Jury Research Update Eisenberg, T., Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Heise, M., LaFountain, N., Munsterman, G. T., Ostrom, B. & Wells, M. T. (2006). Juries, judges, and punitive damages: Empirical analyses using the civil justice survey of state courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 data. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 3, pp. 263-295.

Jane Perez, a Fairfax, Virginia, resident and Air Force veteran wrote a Yelp review of work performed by a contractor (see YELP).  The criticisms in my posts are substantiated by 42 court exhibits (See Court ExhibitsA, and Court ExhibitsB, and Court ExhibitsC)  Exhibits 32-36 show Dietz’ work. Exhibits 37-42 show the work of other contractors hired to redo/complete/repair damage from Dietz’ work. The exhibits also include relevant estimates, invoices and canceled checks (not shown here).   

Information on the case (from both sides) can be found at (NEWS).  The lower curt denied most of plaintiff's injunction but ordered Ms. Perez to eliminate two parts of the post. She appealed.  The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed the preliminary injunction two days later.

She is requesting donations to assist her with costs. Her income is only $20,000 a year and costs are roughly estimated to be in excess of $38,000 to bring the case forward.  It is suspected that an association of home remodeling contractors is funding the plaintiff Dietz' legal fees.